« Critics aren't obligated to support theater we don't like. | Main | The Only Thing Wrong With Chicago Theater »

August 28, 2009

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Ed

I saw both kids in Caroline. Maybe it's cruel, but bluntly, watching Malcolm in the show was a completely different (waaaaaay better)experience than watching the other guy. Also, I think they're bound by their own rules to not be able to consider actors who aren't in the official opening night cast that the seven recommending judges attend.

Rob Kozlowski

The Jake Cohen nomination was one of my favorites. It's almost like they were paying attention!

By the way, I'm still fuzzy about Jeff recommendations. Should a Jeff Committee member recommend the show if there is at least *one* component of the show worthy of being considered for nomination? Because I can't think of a single show I've ever seen in which EVERYTHING was bad, from the script to the acting to the direction to the set to the lightings to the costumes. Hell, even Passion Play *looked* nice.

Bilal

Rob -

The Recommendation comes when the judges consider at least one element "OUTSTANDING" and additionally consider two(?) more elements at at least the level below that. "EXCELLENT"? "QUITE GOOD"? I'm not sure of the exact denomination.

Ed

There are three ways you can get recommended (as a non-equity show at least):

1) All seven judges vote for the same element as outstanding, even if they don't vote for anything else.

2) Between all the judges there are more than twenty "outstanding element" votes cast.

3) The way that makes everyone's eyes cross trying to understand it:
-At least five judges vote elements as outstanding (since they also have the option of recording "no votes") IF
-4 votes are for the same element, PLUS
-a second element gets 3 votes.

The exception to this is if there are 3 or fewer actors in your show; then the 'three votes for a second element' requirement is waived. (I think the rationale is that with such a small cast you have fewer categories for which you're eligible). This rule is also modified on the rare occasions that only six judges attend, but the explanation of the modified rule made my ears bleed so I stopped trying to figure it out.

Bilal

Thanks, Ed. I knew I wasn't quite getting that right.

Educated Guesser

I believe the second kid in Caroline was not elligible to be nominated because he did not appear in enough performances.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Who? What?

  • Kris Vire
    I write about theater for Time Out Chicago. I write more about it here.

    Any opinion expressed here is solely that of the author or commenter. No opinion expressed here can be assumed to represent the opinion of Time Out Chicago magazine.

@krisvire on Twitter

    follow me on Twitter

    Recently Seen

    • 06/24: Cherrywood (Mary-Arrchie Theatre Company)
    • 06/20: Sweet and Hot: The Songs of Harold Arlen (Theo Ubique)
    • 06/16: Shakespeare's King Phycus (Strange Tree Group)
    • 06/12: Sketchbook (Collaboraction)
    • 06/11: Dead Letter Office (Dog & Pony Theatre Company)
    • 06/09: Itsoseng (Chicago Shakespeare Theater)
    • 06/05: Low Down Dirty Blues (Northlight)
    • 06/04: Inherit the Whole (Mortar Theatre)
    • 05/27: Hunting and Gathering (Theatre Seven of Chicago)
    • 05/25: Fuerza Bruta (Broadway in Chicago)
    • 05/24: War with the Newts (Next Theatre)
    • 05/20: Baal (TUTA)
    • 05/19: The 39 Steps (nat'l tour)
    • 05/13: A Streetcar Named Desire (Writers' Theatre)
    • 05/12: From a Fading Light (Plasticene)
    • 05/10: Neverwhere (Lifeline Theatre)
    • 05/09: The Good Negro (Goodman)
    • 05/07: Sweet Tea (About Face)
    • 05/05: The Last Cargo Cult (Mike Daisey @ Victory Gardens)
    • 05/03: The Love of the Nightingale (Red Tape Theatre)
    Blog powered by Typepad

    Visitors