Review day updates
New reviews at TOC: Fatboy, Dolly West's Kitchen and 1776. Read the rest of the reviews from Christopher, Novid and Brian here.

That TOC blog post about the Jeffs that I pointed to in my last post erupted into a real shitstorm today. As of this writing, 14 comments, and it was one of the most requested pages on the site today. (And I got a lot of incoming clicks on my own post from various webmails, so at least one of you out there is mailing it around.) So far the defenders of non-Equity theater—many of them theater artists, many of them designers declaring that they're members of their own unions and work on both sides of the Equity divide—are outnumbering the non-Equity bashers nearly 2-to-1, but the bashers will brook no arguments. With statements like "Julie is completely correct. The example she chose (Goodman/Lifeline) is based on sound judgement and is unarguable," well, it starts to feel like you're debating gay marriage with Fred Phelps. I beg of you, non-Equity bashers, tell me who bought you that Hater-ade you're drinking?
In happier traffic news, I got to chatting with a young playwright on the bus Saturday after we'd both attended the panel on female playwrights at Chicago Dramatists that I mentioned a couple of weeks ago. (I hope to have some notes from the panel up on the TOC Blog tomorrow.) Eventually I asked her how she'd found out about the panel: was it in TOC's listings, the Reader, maybe she's on Chicago Dramatists' mailing list—this is naturally something that interests me.
She thought for a second, and said, "Oh, you know, I saw it on Storefront Rebellion. Do you know that blog?"
Awesome. And hi, Jenny.
it starts to feel like you're debating gay marriage with Fred Phelps.
This was EXACTLY the same thought I had, right down to the laughable argument that if you're allowed to call what is given to non-Equity performers (gays) an "award" (marriage) that it somehow makes the Equity Jeff Award (straight marriage) meaningless.
You can't ever really argue with the non-Equity haters, though. You can only pity them for the theatre they're missing while they fall over each other to spend $100 on The Pirate Queen.
Posted by: Bilal | January 29, 2008 at 08:29 AM
Well, and how many weeks does an Equity actor have to work in order to keep their insurance? I did an interview with Jim Leaming and Carmen Roman for Performink on the new Todd Logan play they're doing, and they brought up as an aside that even being Equity doesn't mean you work all the time, especially in Chicago. So if you're an Equity actor who does two or three shows with an Equity contract, does that mean you're better at your craft than a non-Equity actor who maybe does five shows a year?
It's a ridiculous argument. Especially since I'm sure it's mostly about the Jeff people just trying to get rid of awkward nomenclature.
Posted by: Kerry Reid | January 29, 2008 at 11:26 AM
Hi, Kris!
Posted by: Jenny | January 29, 2008 at 12:24 PM
Interesting--our fellows across the pond seem to be discussing a similar topic today:
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/theatre/2008/01/whats_the_point_of_the_fringe.html
Posted by: Bilal | January 29, 2008 at 01:41 PM
Oh lord, I'm about to contradict my whole fringetastic theatre-goer persona, but I do wish the distinction between the two categories would become clearer instead of less clear. (Does anyone else think the best way to do this would be awarding them at the same time? I'm serious.)
It's less because of some hazy idea of professionalism, than because the rules are genuinely different. One winner versus as many winners as you please. And in certain cases there's a big difference just in the size of the pool. I always feel like the non-equity New Writing category is very low on competition, mostly because world premieres either come from equity companies, or from one-off companies that don't qualify.
And that just reminded me of other things that vaguely annoy me about the Jeffs. Ack, I don't know. Citation was a stupid word. But they could have worked on some changes that were less cosmetic instead.
Posted by: Reina | January 29, 2008 at 04:45 PM
Oh, and the main reason I wish they were all less confusing? The Jeffs once severely confused my out-of-town friend when she used them as a tool to investigate current Chicago theatre. I was able to help her out, but not everyone has a local.
Posted by: Reina | January 29, 2008 at 04:57 PM